<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://laeger.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laeger.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New song demo &#8211; If You&#8217;re You by cheryl</title>
		<link>http://laeger.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/new-song-demo-if-youre-you/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeger.wordpress.com/?p=441#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Love it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New song demo &#8211; If You&#8217;re You by Jay</title>
		<link>http://laeger.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/new-song-demo-if-youre-you/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeger.wordpress.com/?p=441#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Haha, very cute! Love a bit of toilet humour also - &quot;if you coo, if you poo, if you sneeze&quot;. 
Is it just me or is there a bit of a Randy Newman quality to this song? Very nice, Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, very cute! Love a bit of toilet humour also &#8211; &#8220;if you coo, if you poo, if you sneeze&#8221;.<br />
Is it just me or is there a bit of a Randy Newman quality to this song? Very nice, Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intimacy issues (Part 1) by Rose</title>
		<link>http://laeger.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/intimacy-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laeger.wordpress.com/?p=421#comment-260</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s much of a stretch to say that those who complain about &quot;shallow&quot; worship songs have intimacy issues.  Everyone has issue.  Those who complain, I believe, lack maturity.  And I think we have to be patient with them as they hopefully grow up.  I feel sorry for the ones that who never seem to get beyond criticizing, those who don&#039;t ask the question, &quot;Why did the songwriter use that phrase?&quot;  To jump to the conclusion that some of the words have come into a song without much thought is just immature and shortsighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s much of a stretch to say that those who complain about &#8220;shallow&#8221; worship songs have intimacy issues.  Everyone has issue.  Those who complain, I believe, lack maturity.  And I think we have to be patient with them as they hopefully grow up.  I feel sorry for the ones that who never seem to get beyond criticizing, those who don&#8217;t ask the question, &#8220;Why did the songwriter use that phrase?&#8221;  To jump to the conclusion that some of the words have come into a song without much thought is just immature and shortsighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
